Bout class includes fighters who fought in
UFC from 12/2010-6/2017. Bout class is around 1200 fighters.
Identity included any fighter whose likeness was used over same
time in promos merch, etc. Basically means fewer fighters qualify
for damages and UFC won’t have to defend that. https://t.co/YZyUKK0rsn— Josh Gross (@yay_yee)
December 10, 2020
A federal antitrust lawsuit filed in 2014 by former Ultimate Fighting Championship fighters cleared
a make-or-break hurdle on Thursday.
Judge Richard J. Boulware, a U.S. District Court Judge in Nevada,
confirmed what he
teased in September by granting class certification in Cung Le, et al.
v. Zuffa LLC.
The lawsuit alleges that UFC violated antitrust laws by
monopolizing the MMA industry using anticompetitive practices in
the form of long-term, exclusive contracts that prevented fighters
from negotiating deals on the open market, and further controlling
the MMA industry by acquiring and then shutting down other
promotions. This lack of competition, the fighters argue, resulted
in fighters being paid far less than what they could have earned in
a competitive market.
“This is an enormous win for all UFC fighters, past, present and
future,” Cung Le said in
a statement issued by the Mixed Martial Arts Fighters Association.
“For too long, the UFC has taken advantage of fighters by
monopolizing the industry, and cheated fighters out of millions of
dollars each year. Today’s decision by Judge Boulware means our
case can proceed for all UFC fighters that are part of the
class.”
The official order confirming that the “bout” class will move
forward is expected no later than Monday. The class includes any
person who competed in one or more live professional UFC promoted
MMA bouts taking place or broadcast in the United States from Dec.
16, 2010 to June 30, 2017. The plaintiffs estimate that this
includes roughly 1,200 fighters.
Boulware, however, declined to certify to the “identity” class,
which would have made any fighter whose likeness was used by the
UFC over the same period party to the litigation.
“Today’s decision brings us one step closer to enjoying a
competitive market which will allow fighters to be paid their true
worth,” Nate Quarry,
who sought to be included in the “identity” class, said in the
MMAFA statement. “By bringing this lawsuit and standing up to the
UFC, we’ve had more disclosure in the last few years regarding the
unfair split of revenues and coercive negotiating tactics of the
UFC than in the prior 25 years combined.”
Had Boulware chosen against granting class certification the case
would have effectively ended, but not before a trove of information
regarding the financial reality of UFC’s business was brought to
light. As revealing as the case has been thus far, the UFC now
faces the prospect that this antitrust lawsuit could forever change
the way it — and the rest of the American MMA business — conducts
business.
In addition to significant monetary damages ranging from $800
million to $1.6 billion, the plaintiffs seek to correct the UFC’s
alleged anticompetitive practices. This could include altering how
contracts are structured and instituting a ranking system across
MMA that includes fighters regardless of promoter.